Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Eadie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1902No. 12,611PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from coiirt of appeals, southern department; A. W. Dennison, M. Schoonover, and B. F. Milton, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J. :

January 1.-1888, Robert Eadie made to A. C. Wilcox his promissory note, in the sum of $350, due five years from date, payable at the Girard *460National Bank, Philadelphia, Pa., secured by trust deed on property in Greeley county, in which one E. Heliker, of the McKinley & Heliker Investment Company, of McPherson, Kan., was nominated as trustee. This note contained the following stipulation :

“If default be made in the payment of any interest note, or any portion thereof, for the space of ten days after the same becomes due and payable, or in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Holland v. Van BeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Lester v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Schermerhorn v. FarleyNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aultman Thrashing & Engine Co. v. KnollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. RowanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Golden Rule Insurance v. Tomlinson Ex Rel. Commissioner of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API