Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Wynn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1961No. 21109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The Court of Appeals certified to this court the following question: “Do the provisions of Ga. Code Ann. § 110-113 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 444; 1957, pp. 224, 236), which read in part as follows: ‘Whenever a motion for a directed verdict, made at the close of all the evidence is denied, or for any reason is not granted, a party who has moved for a directed verdict, within 30‘ days after the reception of verdict, may move to have the verdict and any judgment entered thereon set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with his motion for directed verdict; . .…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shockey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Hines v. McLellanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Durden v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. City of Albany v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bynes v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Norman v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Heiman v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API