Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Wynn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1961No. 38430PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

The Court of Appeals certified the following question to the Supreme Court: “Do the provisions of Code § 110-113, Code Ann. (Acts 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 444; 1957, pp. 224, 236), which read in part as follows: ‘Whenever a motion for a directed verdict, made at the close of all the evidence is denied, or for any reason is not granted, a party who has moved for a directed verdict, within 30 days after the reception of verdict, may move to have the verdict and any judgment entered thereon set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with his motion for directed verdict; .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hines v. McLellanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Durden v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. City of Albany v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. SOUTHWIND TRUCKING CO., INC. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Heiman v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API