Neidlein v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Theodore A. Bell, Arthur L. Shannon and Shinn & Hart for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellqtti, C. J.
Francis J. Neidlein, a switch-tender in the employ of defendant, was killed while working in defendant’s freight-yard at Sacramento by being crushed between two cars. He left surviving him as his sole heir at law his mother, Catherine Neidlein. She was appointed adminis tratrix of his estate, and upon the theory that at the time of the accident the deceased was engaged as the employee of defendant in interstate commerce, a matter not disputed, brought this action as such administratrix, alleging negligence on the part of defendant proximately causing the death. At the trial, the case for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Connelley v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Crowe v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Casey v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Travis v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925