Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1896No. 17,861PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Vermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

— Appellant, after giving the notice required by law, filed in the auditor’s office of Vermillion county, on August 31, 1895, his application for a license to sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, at Dana, Holt township, of said county. On Thursday, August 29,1895, there was filed with the said auditor, a remonstrance under section nine of an act approved March 11, 1895, Acts 1895, p. 251, commonly cabed the Nicholson law, against granting a license to said appellant, which remonstrance, it was claimed, was signed by a majority of the voters of said Holt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mode v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Womack v. McahrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Towell v. HollwegIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Krohn v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Sutherland v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fashion Thimble Shoe Company v. WithrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Behler v. AckleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Boomershine v. UlineIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API