Flynn v. Taylor
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vermillion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.
— Appellant, after giving the notice required by law, filed in the auditor’s office of Vermillion county, on August 31, 1895, his application for a license to sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, at Dana, Holt township, of said county. On Thursday, August 29,1895, there was filed with the said auditor, a remonstrance under section nine of an act approved March 11, 1895, Acts 1895, p. 251, commonly cabed the Nicholson law, against granting a license to said appellant, which remonstrance, it was claimed, was signed by a majority of the voters of said Holt…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mode v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Womack v. McahrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Towell v. HollwegIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Krohn v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Sutherland v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Fashion Thimble Shoe Company v. WithrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Behler v. AckleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Boomershine v. UlineIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.