Legal Opinion

Boomershine v. Uline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1902No. 19,786PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Elkhart Circuit Court; J. 8. Drake, Special Judge. Application for license to sell liquor by Adam Roomer-shine. Remonstrance by Barney Uline and others. From a judgment refusing the license, the applicant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— This proceeding was brought by appellant under §7278 Burns 1901, §5314 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1901, to obtain a license to sell intoxicating liquors at Nap*501panee, Locke township, Elkhart county, in a less quantity' than five gallons at a time. Acts 1897, p. 253, §7283 Bums 1901, §5318 Horner 1901. On appeal, the court below refused the license on the ground that a majority of the legal voters of said Locke township had remonstrated against the granting of such license, under §7283i Burns 1901, §5323i Horner 1901, being section nine of the act known as the Nicholson law.

Appellant first insists…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Welsh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of Chicago v. StrattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Groesch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Cain v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McPherson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API