Peterson v. Heitkamp
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
James Peterson and Ashland Oil, Inc. appeal from a district court order affirming the Tax Commissioner’s assessment of an oil extraction tax against Ashland Oil. We affirm.
Section 57-51.1-02, NDCC, 1 imposes an oil extraction tax on oil produced in North Dakota. Section 57-51.1-03(2), NDCC, 2 provides an exemption from the tax for “stripper well property.” “Stripper well property” is defined by NDCC § 57-51.1-01(8) 3 as “a ‘property’ 4 whose average daily production of oil ... [meets specified requirements] during any preceding consecutive twelve-month period beginning after…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Coldwell Banker-First Realty v. MEIDE & SON, INCORPORATEDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Ladish Malting Co. v. Stutsman County Ex Rel. Stutsman County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. StetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hayden v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Western Gas Resources, Inc. v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.