Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Heitkamp

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1989No. Civ. 890008PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

James Peterson and Ashland Oil, Inc. appeal from a district court order affirming the Tax Commissioner’s assessment of an oil extraction tax against Ashland Oil. We affirm.

Section 57-51.1-02, NDCC, 1 imposes an oil extraction tax on oil produced in North Dakota. Section 57-51.1-03(2), NDCC, 2 provides an exemption from the tax for “stripper well property.” “Stripper well property” is defined by NDCC § 57-51.1-01(8) 3 as “a ‘property’ 4 whose average daily production of oil ... [meets specified requirements] during any preceding consecutive twelve-month period beginning after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Coldwell Banker-First Realty v. MEIDE & SON, INCORPORATEDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ladish Malting Co. v. Stutsman County Ex Rel. Stutsman County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. StetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hayden v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Western Gas Resources, Inc. v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API