Legal Opinion

United States v. Stefan Irving

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 23, 2005No. Docket 04-0971-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge CABRANES concurs in part, and dissents in part, in a separate opinion.

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Stefan Irving (defendant or appellant) was convicted, among other crimes, of traveling abroad for the purpose of engaging in sexual acts with minors. The conviction arose from defendant’s trips to Mexico and Honduras. The proof of the travel to Mexico and its purpose was strong. But, only the proof of travel to Honduras was established, the proof of its purpose came from uncorroborated writings in defendant’s personal journal. It is a well-established principle that a conviction in…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Stefan IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. FrabizioDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  5. United States v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API