Legal Opinion
United States v. Bowen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 17, 2010No. S1 07 Cr. 961(LBS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
On September 8, 2008, the Government filed the First Superseding Indictment (the “Indictment”) against Defendants Olivia Jeanne Bowen (“Bowen”), Noemi Dodakian (“Dodakian”), David Norman (“Norman”), Robert Ingram (“Ingram”), and Chong Shin Wu (“Wu”). The Indictment charges two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Defendants are alleged to have participated in two interrelated fraud schemes. Bowen, Dodakian, and Norman are charged in Count One. Bowen, Dodakian, Ingram, and Wu are charged in Count Two. Both alleged conspiracies…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Preventive Medicine Associates, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. WeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re a Warrant for All Content & Other Information Associated with the Email Account xxxxxxx@ Gmail.com Maintained at Premises Controlled by Google, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. D'AmicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.