Legal Opinion

Klement v. Lindell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1941No. 31044PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

Plaintiff’s action is predicated on defendants’ negligence in causing a collision of defendants’ truck with plaintiff’s automobile, and is for damages sustained by reason of personal injuries. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendants moved for a directed verdict which was sustained. Plaintiff appeals.

The acts of negligence charged against defendants, briefly stated, are as follows: Defendant Boyer, driver of the truck, was negligent in that he did not stay in the usual line of travel or avail himself of the opportunity to safely pass behind plaintiff when there was ample room to do so, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moncrief v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McDonald v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Eaton v. MerrittNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Whittaker v. HanifinNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Davis v. HoskinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Long v. WhalenNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kundert v. B. F. Goodrich Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Stark v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Corbitt v. Omaha Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Thomas v. OwensNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API