Legal Opinion
Kavanewsky v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 10, 1971PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The following facts are pertinent to this appeal. In 1934, the town of Warren adopted zoning pursuant to the provisions of chapter 29 of the Revision of 1930, now chapter 124 of the General Statutes. In 1959, by ordinance, the town was divided into two zones, one north and the other *398south. The north zone was made subject to certain uses, including a requirement that a building lot contain not less than one acre and have a width of not less than 100 feet. Still another provision required that “no business conducted for a profit shall be operated on any premises except by a resident of the Town…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Bartram v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Malafronte v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.