MacK v. State

Miller, Judge.

Convicted of robbery by force, David Mack appeals on general grounds. He also contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

1. Mack argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction for robbery by force because there was no testimony that he struck the victim or that the victim was injured. He concludes that at most the evidence supported a conviction of theft by taking.

OCGA § 16-8-40 (a) (1) provides that a person commits robbery when, with intent to commit theft, he takes the property of another from the person or the immediate…