Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Wash

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill in Chancery, &c., in the Sangamon Circuit Court, filed by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error. The cause was heard before the Hon. Samuel H. Treat, at the March term 1845, when the hill was dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Caton, J.*

This bill was filed in the name of George Bryan, Sr., by his agent, N. Bryan, to have a deed which was signed and acknowledged by complainant conveying land to Mary Jane Bryan, which is charged never to have been delivered, but wrongfully and fraudulently obtained by Wash, who had intermarried with Mary Jane Bryan,—restored to the safe keeping and possession of N. Bryan, with whom it had been deposited, and the record of said deed be made void and have no legal effect; and that said deed may abide ■ said N. Bryan’s discretion in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheelwright v. WheelwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Church v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Ruggles v. LawsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Belden v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
  5. New-York Firemen Insurance v. WaldenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1815

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Clark v. CreswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  3. Vaughan v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Talty v. SchoenholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API