Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Godman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1885No. 12,113PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From tbe Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollabs, J.

We copy from the opinion rendered in this cause upon a former appeal, and reported as Vaughan v. Godman, 94 Ind. 191, the following summary of appellant’s complaint:

“Appellant was the owner of parts of two lots in the city of Lafayette, which he acquired by purchase and deeds—one in the year 1864 and one in 1865. This property was bought for a family residence, was paid for by appellant out of his earnings, and constituted the whole of his property. In 1859 appellant married Mrs. Shay; she did not at that time, nor *500did she at any time thereafter, own any property. Appellee Catharine was born…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Gilbert v. North American Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Berry v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Cecil v. BeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Quick v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Nowlen v. NowlenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Indiana Trust Co. v. ByramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Colee v. ColeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API