Legal Opinion

Hesse v. McClintic

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 14, 2008No. 06SC624PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

Respondent Colleen McClintic was rear-ended by Petitioner Donald Hesse when she slowed for bighorn sheep that had entered her lane of travel on the highway. McClintic brought a negligence claim against Hesse stemming from the accident. Hesse raised the defense of comparative negligence, claiming that McClintic was negligent in failing to pull onto the shoulder instead of slowing in the lane of travel. At the close of evidence, McClintic moved for a directed verdict on the issue of her comparative negligence, which the trial court denied. The jury found McClintic to be thirty percent at fault.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Gas Repair Service, Inc. v. KulikSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Gordon v. BensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Young v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Colorado Coffee Bean, LLC v. Peaberry Coffee Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Kendrick v. PippinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Sonitrol Management Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Bedee v. American Medical Response of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In re P.W. v. Children's Hospital ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API