Cordova v. Emergency Professional Servs., Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARY J. BOYLE, J.:
{¶ 1} This appeal involves a medical malpractice action following a unanimous jury verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, Thomas Mucci, D.O. Plaintiffs-appellants, Lynn and Raymond Cordova, in their sole assignment of error, argue that the trial court impermissibly refused to excuse juror No. 3-an internal medicine physician-for cause.
{¶ 2} This appeal strikes at the core of our legal system: the jury. The purpose of our jury system is to impress upon the community as a whole that a verdict is given in accordance with the law by persons who are fair and impartial. See…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LloydOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Nadin v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023