Legal Opinion
General Aniline & Film Corp. v. A. Schrader & Son, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
The plaintiff Q-eneral Aniline & Film Corporation, a self-insured employer, paid workmen’s compensation benefits to an employee who was injured while operating a punch press. Asserting that the machine contained a defective exhaust valve, sold to it by the defendant Neal and manufactured by the defendant Schrader, and that that defective part caused the machine to malfunction, the plaintiff instituted this action for damages against both the manufacturer and the seller of the valve. The first cause of action, in which the plaintiff sues as subrogee under section 29 of the Workmen’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Claim of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- John Wanamaker, New York, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Strait Scale Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Erie Castings Company v. Grinding Supply, Inc. And Acme Abrasive CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Gambino v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between City of AmsterdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Leaseway System Corp. v. Rushmore & Weber, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983