Seagren v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
—This appeal which is presented on the judgment roll alone is from that portion of a judgment rendered in an action by a patentee for an accounting and injunction against his licensee by which the trial court determined that it was without jurisdiction to grant any relief from and after the date of a notice given to him by the defendant cancelling the license.
Prom a recitation in appellant’s opening brief outlining the factual background of the instant litigation—which is not disputed by respondent—it appears that appellant is the inventor of a multiple gear rotary pump used in pumping…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- In Re Norcor Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Pendleton v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- in re Michigan Motor Specialties Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lear Siegler, Inc., a Corporation v. John S. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Adkins v. Lear, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Oximetrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.