Legal Opinion
Jolly v. Academy Collection Service, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided November 3, 2005No. 1:04 CV 01165PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BULLOCK, District Judge.
On September 12, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants Academy and Green’s partial motion to dismiss (docket no. 6) and defendant Citibank’s motion to dismiss (docket no. 9) be, and the same hereby are, granted, and defendant Citibank is hereby…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. BusbyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Spirax Sarco, Inc. v. SSI Engineering, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Bonham v. WOLF CREEK ACADEMYDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Landmar, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.