Legal Opinion

Rushton v. O'MALLEY

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 1, 1980No. 16248PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craven

This case presents the need to interpret section 1 of “An Act to require the payment of interest by lessors of residential real property on security deposits made by lessees” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 74, par. 91), which provides:

“A lessor of residential real property, containing 25 or more units, who receives a security deposit from a lessee to secure the payment of rent or compensation for damage to property shall pay interest to the lessee 6 *

Specifically, it must be determined if the defendant is a “lessor of residential real property, containing 25 or more units” where he owns four…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Illinois Power Co. v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. SavaianoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First Arlington National Bank v. StathisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Fess v. Parke, Davis & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Brown v. Cook County Forest PreserveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. People v. BlairAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Tobin v. McClureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API