Legal Opinion
Shultz v. Heyison
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 26, 1975No. Civ. 74-1176PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
This is an action challenging the constitutionality of the Pennsylvania Act of 1959, P.L. 58, §§ 1413 and 1414, as amended by the Act of 1967, P.L. 30, § 1, 75 P.S. 1413 and 1414.
Under § 1412 of the Act, it is the duty of the Prothonotary of any court in which a judgment resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle is rendered to forward to the Secretary of Revenue a certified copy of such judgment if it has not been satisfied within 60 days of its entry. Upon receipt of a certified copy of such judgment, the Secretary is required by § 1413 to suspend the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooper v. Orleans Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Norris v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Madison v. Director, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Piercy v. HeyisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Piercy v. HeyisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977