Piercy v. Heyison
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1ConcurrenceWeis, Circuit Judge
In view of the low threshold set out by Goosby v. Osser, 409 U.S. 512, 93 S.Ct. 854, 35 L.Ed.2d 36 (1973), I agree it is necessary to convene a three-judge court in this case. The thrust of plaintiff’s position is that §§ 1404 and 1413 form part of an integral plan and since § 1404 has been declared unconstitutional, the validity of § 1413 is undermined insofar as it can authorize a suspension without a hearing. She contends the impending application of § 1404, which would allow suspension of her license before any determination of fault, coerced her into signing the judgment note. Asserting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goosby v. OsserSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- MacQuarrie v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kilfoyle v. HeyisonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.