Legal Opinion · Dissent

Benedict G. Wenske and Elizabeth Wenske v. Steve Ealy and Deborah Ealy

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2017No. 16-0353Published

1Dissent

Justice Boyd,

joined by Justice Willett, Justice Lehrmann, and Justice Devine, dissenting.

The deed in this case grants all of the interests in all of the property to the grantees, “subject to” a reservation for the grantors of a 3/8ths mineral interest and an exception of a l/4th royalty interest that belongs to previous owners. The only thing “subject to” anything is the interest granted to the grantees. Neither the reserved mineral interest nor the excepted royalty interest is “subject to” anything. Under the deed’s plain language, only the interest granted to the grantees is “subject to”…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Woods v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Benge v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API