Ament v. Lowenthall
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. Action for conversion. December 12. 1889, plaintiff, Lowenthall, had judgment, and defendant, Ament, comes here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HoitTON, C. J.:
Mrs. Lottie G. Lowenthall brought her-action against C. W. Ament for the unlawful conversion of certain personal property, and recovered judgment against him for $894.75, which judgment is sought to be reversed.. Ament loaned money to the husband of Mrs. Lowenthall, who stated he was the owner of the goods, and Ament held the same under a chattel mortgage executed by the husband. The goods belonged to Mrs. Lowenthall, and the mortgage-was executed by her husband without her knowledge or consent.
The serious trouble in the case is over the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sibert v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hale v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Ard v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898