Legal Opinion

Wagner Ex Rel. Wagner v. Squibb

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2003No. 20020237PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald and Deborah Squibb (“the Squibbs”) appeal from the trial court’s amended judgment as a matter of law, entered in favor of plaintiff Hayley Wagner, who appears by and through her parents, Peter and Lori Wagner (“the Wag-ners”). We affirm.

[¶ 2] On December 27, 1998, one of the Squibbs’ dogs bit Hayley Wagner. The Squibbs were out of town at the time of the incident, but had asked Thomas Sem-mens to care for the Squibbs’ house and dogs during their absence. At the time of the incident the dogs were loose in front of the house. Semmens had been told to keep the dogs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KensmoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Anderson v. KrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Christianson v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. StockertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Riemers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API