Legal Opinion

Estate of Nah-Me-Tsa-He v. Pope

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1926No. 16979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Osage .county, rendered on the 12th day of October, 1925, affirming the judgment of the county court of said county and denying the plaintiff in error the right to collect the inheritance tax under the laws of the state of Oklahoma out of the estate of Nah-me-tsa-he, deceased, an incompetent, full-blood Osage Indian.

Parties will be referred to here as they appeared in the lower court, that is, C. C. Childers as plaintiff and the defendants in error as defendants.

The plaintiff, C. C. Childers, as State Auditor,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Barry v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City of Ardmore v. StuchulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Pryor v. CraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API