Legal Opinion

Hall v. United States

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided November 30, 2020No. 7:15-cv-00105Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. 7:14-2-KKC-2 and Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 7:15-105-KKC V. EARNEST BRADLEY HALL, OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. *** *** *** Earnest Bradley Hall, pro se, moves to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (DE 54; DE 55.) The Government has responded (DE 69), and Hall has replied (DE 73). Upon consideration of these filings and the record in this case, for the reasons given below, Hall’s § 2255 motion will be denied. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API