Legal Opinion

University of Utah v. Richards

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original application in this court for writ of mandat© to compel the State Auditor to draw his warrant for $5,000 to be expended by plaintiff under Chapter 5 of the Laws of 1899. This is an action in mandamus, brought to compel the State Auditor to issue a warrant for five thousand dollars to be expended by the plaintiff under the provisions of Chap. 5, of the Laws of 1899, the defendant having refused to draw a warrant for said amount, on the ground that the plaintiff did…

Read the full summary

Original application in this court for writ of mandat© to compel the State Auditor to draw his warrant for $5,000 to be expended by plaintiff under Chapter 5 of the Laws of 1899. This is an action in mandamus, brought to compel the State Auditor to issue a warrant for five thousand dollars to be expended by the plaintiff under the provisions of Chap. 5, of the Laws of 1899, the defendant having refused to draw a warrant for said amount, on the ground that the plaintiff did not comply with the provisions of Chap. 53, of the Laws of 1899. The sole question involved is, what interpretation or…

1Opinion of the CourtMiner, J.

This is an action brought to obtain a writ of mandamus against the State Auditor, requiring him to issue a warrant for $5,000, to be expended by the plaintiff, through its regents, under the provisions of Ch. 5, Sess. Laws 1899, the defendant having refused on application to draw a warrant for such sum on the ground that Ch. 53, Sess. Laws 1899, supersedes and is repugnant to Ch. 5, and that the plaintiff had not complied therewith. We are required to place a construction or interpretation on these two provisions of the statute.

The legislature of this state, at its session in 1899, enacted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gallegos Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Midvale CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Bateman v. Board of ExaminersUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nelden v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Kelleher v. FrenchDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API