Legal Opinion

Stolpe v. Duquesne City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1939No. Appeals, 236 and 237PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife, as the result of a fall upon a paved walk in a public park situated in the business section of the City of Duquesne. The park, which is maintained by the city, is upon a hillside slope, with its higher level abutting Third Street, and its lower boundary fronting on Second Street. The municipal administration building is immediately adjoining and facing the park, which covers approximately one-third of a city block in its area.

The entrance thereto from the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Llewellyn v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Good v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Maselli v. StephensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Loughrey v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McMeekin v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Yago v. PipicelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Timlin v. Scranton (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Drill v. GenettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Heinz v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API