Legal Opinion

Richter v. Hanneman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 11, 1902Published

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff has demurred to the defendant’s answer setting up a counterclaim. The action is brought by the executrix of Ludemann to recover the amount of a loan made by Ludemann to the defendant. The answer sets up as a counterclaim a debt owing by Ludemann at the time of his death to Amanda Hanneman, and alleges that before the commencement of the action she died leaving the defendant, who was her husband, and one daughter surviving, and that letters of administration upon the estate of the deceased wife were duly granted to the defendant by the surrogate having…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olmsted v. . KeyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Westervelt v. . GreggNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Jenkins v. FreyerNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  4. Robins v. . McClureNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Barnes v. . UnderwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API