Legal Opinion

Westervelt v. . Gregg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1854PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before inquiring how far the interest of the husband in his wife's legacy, which vested before the passage of the act for the more effectual protection of the property of married women, is affected by it, it will be necessary to determine what is the nature and extent of that interest. A legacy, or distributive share, accruing to the wife, is regarded as a chose in action, and, as far as the rights of the husband are concerned, it stands upon the same footing as a promissory note, or other property of a similar character. (Garforth v. Bradley, 2 Ves., Sen., 675; Schuyler v. Hoyle, 5 Johns.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Epps v. Van DeusenNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  2. Schuyler v. HoyleNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  3. Whitaker v. WhitakerNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Price Ex Rel. Gaulley v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Matter of Lyons v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API