Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Trotter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Hon. Hugh M. Tate, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Upon a resolution authorizing the issuance of $125,000 of bonds, the proceeds from a sale of which were to he used in remodeling the courthouse in Knoxville, the justices of the peace, composing the county court of Knox county, voted 18 for the issuance of the bonds and 18 against it. Thereupon the county judge cast a vote for the issuance of said bonds, and he declared the resolution carried.

Chapter 736 of the Acts of 1919, authorized the county court of Knox county to issue bonds for such *39purpose not to exceed $125,000 upon a majority of the members of said court voting therefor.

The bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Bd. of Supervisors of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cate v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
  3. Brown v. FosterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  4. Wooster v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API