Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 27, 1925No. Nos. 3173, 3174PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Phillips and his wife were driving along a street in Scranton on a dark, rainy night with lights on their automobile in conformity with the Pennsylvania Acts of July 7, 1913 (P. L. 672, §13), and June 30, 1919 (P. L. 678; Pa. St. 1920, § 964 ot seq.), requiring that at night every motor vehicle shall be equipped with “at least two white lights [whieh are] visible not less than 200 feet in the direction in whieh the motor vehicle is proceeding” and which illuminate the road for that distance and also in conformity with the Ordinance of the City of Scranton of 1915 (No.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Serfas v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Clamper v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Wachsmith v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Todd v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Senft v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Texas Mexican Ry. Co. v. HoyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Texas & N. O. R. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Mabray v. Union Pac. R. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1933
- Murphy v. MilheiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Standard Paving Co. v. Webb.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.