Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Milliken

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 25, 1926No. 11,406PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Action on contract for real estate commission. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error and ask for a supersedeas.

The parties will be referred to as in the trial court. Both sides ask us to decide the case upon the submission of the supersedeas application, which we shall do.

Defendants are husband and wife. The wife owned 280 acres of land in Kansas. The husband dealt with plaintiff in this state for himself and his wife. He listed the land with plaintiff for a trade, pointing out in writing some of its advantages, such as its proximity to oil land to be drilled soon, concluding with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Auto Owners Service Ass'n v. PollardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. PichowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API