Legal Opinion
Platzman v. Munno
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orange-town, dated July 21, 1999, which denied the petitioners’ application for a use variance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Dillon, J.), dated March 24, 2000, which granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding as time-barred.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to Town Law § 267-c (1), the petitioners had 30 days after the filing of the respondents’ determination denying their application for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of Kennedy v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Vill. of Croton-On-HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kroin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pickett v. Town of Tusten Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Casolaro v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ElmsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frank v. Zoning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Barsic v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ramapo Homeowners Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Greene v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Green Harbour Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of Lake George Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.