Frank v. Zoning Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Homeowners Tom Knoesel and Joan Knoesel (hereinafter together the Knoesels) applied to the Zoning Board of Town of Yorktown (hereinafter the Board) for an area variance to legalize an existing fence which was taller than permitted by the Town Code. The Knoesels subsequently requested variances for two small sheds on their property which did not meet setback requirements, and the Board amended their application to include this relief. The Board granted the application, concluding, inter alia, that legalizing the fence would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. The petitioners, who…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pecoraro v. Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Caspian Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Goldberg v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ohrenstein v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Smyles v. Board of Trustees of Inc. Vil. of MineolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Davydov v. MamminaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Town of FentonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Matter of Stone Indus., Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Davydov v. MamminaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.