Legal Opinion

Wartell v. Formusa

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1966No. 39206PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hershey

Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Wartell, residents of Illinois, were passing through the State of Florida when they were involved in an automobile collision which caused the death of Mr. Wartell. Mrs. Wartell, who is the plaintiff in this action, suffered injuries in this accident and brought suit in the circuit court of Cook County against the executor of her husband’s estate, alleging that her deceased husband was guilty of willful and wanton negligence in the operation of their car. At the time the complaint was filed, the executor had been discharged and the estate closed, and the complaint was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Heckendorn v. First Nat. Bank of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API