Legal Opinion
City of Clovis v. Scheurich
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1929No. 3231PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
The city of Clovis, as assignee, sued to foreclose paving certificates issued under Laws 1919, c. 152, § 4. Among the defenses interposed were lack of notice and opportunity to be heard, and that the assessment was confiscatory. Judgment went for defendants, discharging the liens, and the city has appealed.
We have not been favored with a brief on behalf of appellee, but have the benefit of the able opinion of the trial court. We also have a brief by amici curiae supporting and somewhat extending the positions taken by appellant.
The trial court found that no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- City of Atlanta v. HamleinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Casey v. TroutSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Wakeley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. District Court of McKinley CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Feldhake v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Francis v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Morehead. v. NickellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Francis v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954