Legal Opinion

Ocean Transport, Inc. v. Greycas, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 30, 1994No. 13-92-453-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

This appeal involves a deficiency suit asserted by Greycas, Inc., against appellants on a $3.1 million promissory note secured by two first preferred ship mortgages on two barges. Appellants filed a counterclaim against appellees for usury and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (the DTP A), 2 and ap-pellees filed counterclaims against appellants for their attorneys fees. The trial was to a jury which found that $250,000 was the unpaid balance due and owing upon the promissory note. It also made an affirmative finding…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Guenther, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  2. Schlager v. Clements, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. Wil-Roye Investment Co. v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  4. Riddick v. Quail Harbor Condominium Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API