United States v. Ronald Averill
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
A grand jury indicted defendants Ronald Averill, Jennifer Earls, and Clarence Mills for conspiring to distribute oxyco-done. Each defendant pleaded guilty to the charge. Averill admitted distributing 10,000 oxycodone pills as part of a plea agreement, while Earls and Mills challenged the number of pills the government attributed to them in their respective pre- sentence reports (PSRs), and requested an evidentiary hearing. Their strategy backfired. Following the hearing, the district court concluded that Earls and Mills distributed a greater number of pills than…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. JerossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Manuel Hernandez (98-1239/2298), Oscar Solis (99-1616)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Calvin McReynolds, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Lamar ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Raymond CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020