Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Averill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2016No. 15-5068, 15-5081, 15-5087UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

A grand jury indicted defendants Ronald Averill, Jennifer Earls, and Clarence Mills for conspiring to distribute oxyco-done. Each defendant pleaded guilty to the charge. Averill admitted distributing 10,000 oxycodone pills as part of a plea agreement, while Earls and Mills challenged the number of pills the government attributed to them in their respective pre- sentence reports (PSRs), and requested an evidentiary hearing. Their strategy backfired. Following the hearing, the district court concluded that Earls and Mills distributed a greater number of pills than…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. JerossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Manuel Hernandez (98-1239/2298), Oscar Solis (99-1616)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Calvin McReynolds, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Lamar ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Raymond CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API