Legal Opinion

Beskin v. Feigenspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Christian Feigenspan, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Dutchess on the 29th day of March, 1898, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at ■ the Dutchess Special Term. ■

1Opinion of the Court

Cullen, J.:

The action is to recover damages for the wrongful taking and conversion of personal property belonging to the plaintiff-. The defendant justified under a chattel mortgage. One Henry Harris originally owned the property in dispute. He executed four mortgages, the first in priority being that given to the defendant. This mortgage was filed on October 21, 1895, and a renewal thereof on October 20, 1896, but not thereafter. On July 15, 1896, under a foreclosure of the other mortgages, the title to the property became vested in Antone Dubeski, and was subsequently transferred by him to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith & Hoe v. AckerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  2. Meech v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Nash v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. C. C. Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Sloan v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Moffat v. BeelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Schwab Manufacturing Co. v. AizenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API