Cornelius v. C. C. Pictures, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, Circuit Judge.
The question at bar is whether, considering that the mortgaged chattels were at the time of mortgage given, and thereafter continued, in the physical possession of a third person, the facts proven constitute or are equivalent to that immediate delivery and actual and continued change of possession required by the law of New York.
Since all the transactions took place in that state, it is admitted that we are obliged to follow the New York law if the rule thereof can be discovered from the decisions of the state’s highest court; and further it is admitted that any rule must…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Karst v. . GaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Union Trust Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Siedenbach v. . RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- National Hudson River Bank v. ChaskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- In Re MerzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Degener v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930