Legal Opinion

Crozier v. Scott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an action in ejectment and involves six lots in the city of Muskegon. Plaintiff holds under a quitclaim deed in the regular chain of title. Defendants are in possession, assert title under a tax deed, effective by notice to plaintiff of right to redeem and his failure to do so, and’ also claim title by prescription. The issues were tried before the court without a jury and findings of fact and conclusions of law filed with exceptions thereto by defendants. Plaintiff had judgment and defendants review by writ of error.

In 1895 plaintiff received a quitclaim deed from the parties who had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schaeffer v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Winters v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Fowler v. StubbingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Closser v. Hanson Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gogebic Lumber Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fernandez Co. v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API