Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the Appellate Division that the attempted proof of other crimes was erroneously admitted. The only question that remains is whether the error may be overlooked as immaterial. Its nature was such that it seems impossible to say that it was not prejudicial to the defendant.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey and Conway, JJ., concur; Sears and Lewis, JJ., taking no part.

Judgments reversed, etc.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. People v. YonkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. People v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. People v. BatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API