Wolf v. Fischman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
Complainants appeal from an order requiring the receiver in a foreclosure proceeding to pay taxes after sale and the entry of a deficiency decree in favor of complainants. No one appears in this court to defend the order.
Complainants filed a bill to foreclose a junior mortgage executed by Rudolph Fischman, one of the defendants; a receiver was appointed; subsequently an order was entered extending the receivership for the benefit of the first mortgage; May 23, 1933, a decree of sale was entered and on June 20th the master’s decree of sale was confirmed and a- deficiency decree of $12,563.13…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. DaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Bothman v. LindstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
- Powell v. VoightIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Verst v. Foreman-State Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
- Wright v. MattersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Builder's Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BickleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934