Builder's Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Bickley
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan
This is the second appeal in this cause. The first was from an order dismissing the bill of complaint of Builder’s Bond & Mortgage Company for want of equity. We reversed and remanded the 'cause with directions that the chancellor 11 enter a decree of foreclosure in favor of complainant in proper form, finding that there was due complainant on April 15, 1930, the date of the master’s report, $15,011.68,-in which is included $1,000 solicitor’s fees. ’ ’ (See Builder’s Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Bickley, 262 Ill. App. 603.) The instant appeal, by complainant, hereinafter called appellant, is from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Davis v. DaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Gorham v. FarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- Bothman v. LindstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939