Legal Opinion
Paroni v. Quick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1965No. 3696PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
Irma Quick, holder of a note secured by a second deed of trust, filed suit against Frank Paroni and Harry J. Kane, trustees under a first deed of trust, both deeds being secured upon the same improved real estate in the District of Columbia, to recover damages from them in their personal capacities for unlawfully failing and refusing to pay her in cash the surplus from the proceeds of a foreclosure sale after payment of the first trust.
The following facts were stipulated by the parties:
The secured debt under the first deed of trust, showing an unpaid balance of $4,597,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Markey v. LangleySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- W. A. H. Church, Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Pioneer Credit Corporation v. Samuel E. Bloomberg, AssigneeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
3Cited by7 opinions
- District of Columbia v. MayhewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Concord Enterprises, Inc. v. BinderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Flowers v. Washington Federal Savings Bank (In Re Flowers)District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust or Mortgage of Castillian Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- L. M. Sullivan Co. v. Essex Broadway Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.