Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Local Union No. 648

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 16, 2011No. 10-P-1449Published

1Opinion of the Court

Discussion. We first review the judge’s determination that the arbitration clause at issue does not fall within the category of “broad,” as it would if it applied to “any differences arising with respect to the interpretation of th[e] contract.” AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Wkrs. of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 650 (1986) (AT&T). Language almost identical to this formulation is contained in Article 22 of the collective bargaining agreement (agreement) between the parties, which is entitled “Grievance Procedure.” The right to arbitration is conditioned on the ability to file a grievance,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Plymouth-Carver Regional School District v. J. Farmer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Drywall Systems, Inc. v. ZVI Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Lexington Insurance v. All Regions Chemical Labs, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Local No. 1710, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API