Legal Opinion

Pennington v. National Supply Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1938No. 8540PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Appellants filed this suit in the District Court seeking an injunction and an accounting against appellee for alleged infringement of patent No. 1,822,710, issued to Harry Pennington on a rotary drilling rig for oil and other deep well drilling. The other appellant, American Well & Prospecting Company, is the sole licensee. The bill was dismissed after a trial on the merits.

The bill alleged the issuance of the patent to Pennington on September 8, 1931, pursuant to his application therefor filed in the Patent Office on December 8, 1925, and the license agreement with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Esme E. Rosaire v. Baroid Sales Division, National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Murray Company of Texas, Inc. v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Bird Provision Co. v. Owens Country Sausage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API