Legal Opinion

Zettel v. City of West Bend

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for. Washington County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Cassoday: It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff owns lot 4, block 8, of the original plat of the city of West Bend, and occupies the same as a homestead and residence, and that the same fronts the east, towards River street, running north and south, and one of the principal streets of the city; that south of that block is Hickory street, running…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for. Washington County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Cassoday: It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff owns lot 4, block 8, of the original plat of the city of West Bend, and occupies the same as a homestead and residence, and that the same fronts the east, towards River street, running north and south, and one of the principal streets of the city; that south of that block is Hickory street, running east and west; that north of that block is Elm ■ street, eighty feet wide, running east and west; that one block north of…

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, J.

The gra/oamen of the complaint is that by reason of the construction of the school-house in Elm street, between Fond du Lac and Elizabeth streets, the plaintiff has been compelled, in driving to and from his garden, to take a more inconvenient and circuitous route, to his clam-*319age. This is on the theory that the plaintiff has sustained special injury by reason of a public nuisance. The portion of Elm. street obstructed by the school-house is more than a block distant from each of the pieces of land owned by the plaintiff. The law applicable is well stated in one of the cases cited by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School District No. 1 v. NeilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. BartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. HolmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McKay v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Blanding v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Thorndike v. Milwaukee Auditorium Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Mahler v. BrumderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API